
NASCAR has now filed a countersuit against 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports for ‘willfully’ violating antitrust laws by orchestrating an anticompetitive collective effort to negotiate charter extension agreement terms.
It has also named 23XI Racing investor and longtime Michael Jordan agent Curtis Polk in the counterclaim.
23XI Racing is owned by Cup Series racing veteran Denny Hamlin, Polk and Jordan. Front Row Motorsports is owned by restaurant franchisee Bob Jenkins. These were the only two teams that ultimately chose not to sign an extension of the charter agreement, which were presented to teams in a de facto take it leave it fashion in September before the start of the playoffs.
Teams have treated charters, which provide guaranteed starting spots and predictable revenue to 36 teams, as franchises. NASCAR rejects any version of the charter agreement in which teams view charters as franchise and become collective partners with a league like in stick and ball sports.
NASCAR has already lost one element of the legal process in which a district judge awarded the teams charter recognized status for the 2025 season through a legal process that currently has a December 1 trial schedule. That decision has been appealed to the fourth district court in Richmond, Virginia.
In the counterclaim, NASCAR says the “the undisputed reality is that it is 23XI and FRM, led by 23XI’s owner and sports agent Curtis Polk, that willfully violated the antitrust laws by orchestrating anticompetitive collective conduct in connection with the terms of the 2025 Charter Agreements.”
“This is not the first time that 23XI and FRM have sought to impose their viewpoints, and those of their counsel, on the racing teams writ large,” NASCAR continued. “And it is truly ironic that in trying to blow-up the Charter system, 23XI and FRM have sought to weaponize the antitrust laws to achieve their goals.”
NASCAR says Curtis Polk attempted to orchestrate an illegal collective bargaining effort and threatened to boycott a qualifying race, presumably the 2024 Duel at Daytona. The Sanctioning Body called the teams in the suit ‘an illegal cartel.’
The countersuit claims that Polk headed the scheme ‘by representing all teams in negotiations, coordinating their conduct, and threatening teams that considered leaving the conspiracy and interfering and negatively affecting NASCAR’s attempts to renew its media rights agreements.’
Full legal document
Charter negotiation timeline
What the charter system is
Why it’s a doomsday scenario if a deal is not reached
Teams hired top antitrust lawyer against NASCAR
Jeff Gordon on why the business model needs to change
Michael Jordan says NASCAR will die without charter permanence
Denny Hamlin says teams just want break even revenue
NASCAR’s June offer to teams ‘was worst yet’
Denny Hamlin on why charters need to be permanent
Smaller teams unified with larger teams
NASCAR, teams making progress on charter deal but hurdles remain
Steve Phelps speaks to Kevin Harvick in wide ranging interview
How drivers feel about the state of the negotiations
Hamlin says negotiations will continue until NASCAR is reasonable
23XI, Front Row refuse to sign NASCAR’s final offer
Denny Hamlin defers to 23XI statement
Brad Keselowski said time was right for a deal
Lawsuit timeline
23XI Racing, Front Row decline to sign NASCAR’s final 2025-2031 charter document
Why 23XI, Front Row filed a lawsuit against NASCAR
23XI, Front Row makes his case in antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR
Richard Childress says he had ‘no choice’ but to sign charter document
How drivers feel about the lawsuit
Michael Jordan comments on his team’s lawsuit against NASCAR
Meet NASCAR’s antitrust defense lawyer
NASCAR files injunction to be included in charter system through lawsuit
NASCAR motions against team’s preliminary injunction request
NASCAR, teams consent to redacting charter details in filings
Teams make case for injunctive relief, expedited discovery
NASCAR’s lengthy rebuttal to injunction, lawsuit
Teams respond to NASCAR response over injunction
23XI, Front Row and NASCAR go to court over injunctions
Judge rules against teams preliminary injunction request
Denny Hamlin says 23XI may not race next year
What preliminary injunction denial means for lawsuit
NASCAR drops ‘lawsuit release clause’ in open agreement
Appeal timeline rebuttal filed by NASCAR
Why 23XI may not have to race in the Clash without charters
Teams drop appeal, may re-file in district court
23XI, Front Row re-file injunction request
NASCAR opposes expedited timeline
France, NASCAR motion to dismiss, deny SHR charter transfer request
NASCAR says injunctive request still fails to show irreparable harm
Teams say NASCAR went back on its word over SHR charters
23XI, Front Row respond to NASCAR’s motion to dismiss
Judge orders NASCAR to issue charters to 23XI, Front Row
NASCAR plans to appeal injunction ruling; other details
Judge grants partial stay of injunction in blunt response to NASCAR
Teams accuse NASCAR of petulance in response to delay request
Why Judge Bell did not delay his injunction order
NASCAR wants 23XI, FRM to post bond covering 2025 charter pay
Both sides meet in court to argue motion to dismiss, bond payment
Judge rules against NASCAR’s motion to dismiss, trial on schedule
NASCAR files counterclaim