Why were we so wrong about Daniel Jones on draft day?

Daniel Jones Giants

Robert Deutsch-USA TODAY Sports

The New York Giants are coming off a horrible four-win campaign that cost head coach Pat Shurmur his job after just two seasons in that role.

There’s good news on this front. New York seemingly has a quarterback to lead the team into the future in that of 2019 top-10 pick Daniel Jones.

The gist: New York received a ton of criticism for selecting Daniel Jones No. 6 overall last April. The Duke product was seen as a major project that didn’t necessarily translate well to the professional game.

Boy, were we all wrong when it came to Mr. Jones. The 6-foot-5 signal caller had his ups and downs as a rookie. But he more than proved himself as a potential future franchise quarterback.

The stats: One could easily come to the conclusion that Jones put up a better statistical rookie season than No. 1 overall pick Kyler Murray in Arizona.

The scouting reports: We’ve seen it throughout the recent history of the draft. Armchair experts struggling to value players at the game’s most-important position.

Finally, giving David Gettleman credit: We have no idea whether this general manager will be a success in New York. He did get that player at the most-important position on the football field.

Bottom line

Today’s NFL is all about the quarterbacks. Sure we saw a team earn a trip to Super Bowl LIV after its quarterback threw eight passes in the NFC Championship Game. That’s an exception to the rule.

New York went against the grain and got its quarterback at No. 6 overall back in April. It received a ton of criticism in the process. And the team now has that one fundamental building block to start this rebuild.

We were wrong. Gettleman was right. Is that too hard to admit?

Exit mobile version