Do MLB HOF voters need to finally embrace PED users?

In December of 2007, former U.S. Senator George Mitchell released the famed “Mitchell Report,” which detailed the PED use (both alleged and confirmed) of 89 MLB players, including some of the sport’s biggest stars.

In the nearly 12 years that have past, not one player named in that report has been voted into baseball’s Hall of Fame. Additionally, no players that have tested positive (or acknowledged PED use) since are enshrined in Cooperstown.

Related: Yardbarker’s Ultimate Hall of Fame tiers

Unlike “Shoeless” Joe Jackson and Pete Rose, these players being kept out isn’t MLB’s responsibility — not officially, anyway. The responsibility here rests on the shoulders of sports writers who vote on the Hall of Fame. For different reasons, the time has come for those voters to finally welcome these players.

Undeniable hypocrisy: While PED users have been shunned from Cooperstown, those who benefited from having them around have been welcomed with open arms.

Of course, Selig and the managers may not have been directly responsible for what was happening. Heck, they might have even been against it. But if they were, they certainly weren’t being especially vocal on the matter. Like it or not, silence (at least public silence) on the matter from authority figures such as commissioners and managers makes them plenty culpable for what happened.

Ultimately, though, the hypocrisy is only one reason. Maybe you don’t quite buy that the “buck stops here” argument applies to MLB’s authority figures.

That’s fine. There’s a greater reason for letting these players in.

The Hall of Fame is a museum: A museum’s job is to tell the history of its subject. Plenty of PED users are a huge part of MLB history. For the sake of this argument, though, we can focus on four guys.

Sosa, McGwire, Bonds, and Clemens — the former two were primarily responsible for an increased focus on the sport at a time when it was badly needed. The latter two hold the records for most times winning MLB’s most elite awards.

This isn’t to say that every PED user should be in. It also isn’t to say that there shouldn’t be some mention of their PED use on their plaques. These are issues that can be discussed and debated.

What can’t be discussed or debated is that like it or not, these guys are a huge part of MLB history. If the Hall of Fame wants to really tell the history of baseball, the voters must find a way to let some of these PED users in.

Exit mobile version